Difference between revisions of "RadxRate equations"
From Lrose Wiki
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
====== '''R(Z, ZDR)''' ====== | ====== '''R(Z, ZDR)''' ====== | ||
+ | Z-R relationships are known to be overly simplistic, as reflectivity depends on both hydrometeor size and concentration and single polarization only captures the size in one dimension. Thus, rates that take both Z and ZDR into account have been developed, which take the form: | ||
+ | |||
+ | An example of the estimated precipitation using coefficients from [http://wiki.lrose.net/index.php/RadxRate_equations#References Berkowitz et al. (2013)] is shown below. | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[File:Rate_rzhzdr.png|600px]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | ====== '''R(KDP)''' ====== | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[File:Rate_rkdp.png|600px]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | ====== '''R(KDP, ZDR)''' ====== | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[File:Rate_rkdpzdr.png|600px]] | ||
===== '''PID-based estimates''' ===== | ===== '''PID-based estimates''' ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | ====== '''NCAR Hybrid''' ====== | ||
+ | Z-R relationships are known to be overly simplistic, as reflectivity depends on both hydrometeor size and concentration and single polarization only captures the size in one dimension. Thus, rates that take both Z and ZDR into account have been developed, which take the form: | ||
+ | |||
+ | An example of the estimated precipitation using coefficients from [http://wiki.lrose.net/index.php/RadxRate_equations#References Berkowitz et al. (2013)] is shown below. | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[File:Rate_rhybrid_2.png|600px]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | ====== '''CSU HIDRO''' ====== | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[File:Rate_rhidro.png|600px]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | ====== '''Bringi''' ====== | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[File:Rate_rbringi.png|600px]] | ||
===== '''References''' ===== | ===== '''References''' ===== | ||
Berkowitz, D. S., J. A Schultz, S. Vasiloff, K.L. Elmore, C.D. Payne and J.B. Boettcher, 2013: Status of Dual Pol QPE in the WSR-88D Network. AMS 27th conference on hydrology, Austin, Texas, 2.2. [https://ams.confex.com/ams/93Annual/webprogram/Paper221525.html Link] | Berkowitz, D. S., J. A Schultz, S. Vasiloff, K.L. Elmore, C.D. Payne and J.B. Boettcher, 2013: Status of Dual Pol QPE in the WSR-88D Network. AMS 27th conference on hydrology, Austin, Texas, 2.2. [https://ams.confex.com/ams/93Annual/webprogram/Paper221525.html Link] | ||
+ | |||
+ | Bringi, V. N., Williams, C. R., Thurai, M., & May, P. T. (2009). Using Dual-Polarized Radar and Dual-Frequency Profiler for DSD Characterization: A Case Study from Darwin, Australia, Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 26(10), 2107-2122. [https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JTECHA1258.1 Link] | ||
+ | |||
+ | Cifelli, R., Chandrasekar, V., Lim, S., Kennedy, P. C., Wang, Y., & Rutledge, S. A. (2011). A New Dual-Polarization Radar Rainfall Algorithm: Application in Colorado Precipitation Events, Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 28(3), 352-364. [https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JTECHA1488.1 Link] |
Revision as of 01:29, 26 January 2021
Contents
Overview
The goal of RadxRate is to estimate the precipitation rate at each gate within a three-dimensional radar volume. RadxRate includes several equations for estimating precipitation rate, which can be tuned according to the specific environment and precipitation type. This page will walk through these equations.
Polarimetric-based estimates
R(Z)
Probably the most straightforward method of estimating precipitation rates, precipitation (mostly rainfall) can be estimated using an equation in the following form:
Many variations of this equation exist, depending on the precipitation conditions (e.g., convective vs stratiform, tropical vs midlatitude). An example of the estimated precipitation using a tropical version of this equation from northern Taiwan is shown in the image below. Since this particular example is from the lowest elevation angle, the echoes within ~150 km should all correspond to rain. Coefficients for Z-R relationships have been developed for dry snow, but aren't shown here given the warm environment near Taiwan.
R(Z, ZDR)
Z-R relationships are known to be overly simplistic, as reflectivity depends on both hydrometeor size and concentration and single polarization only captures the size in one dimension. Thus, rates that take both Z and ZDR into account have been developed, which take the form:
An example of the estimated precipitation using coefficients from Berkowitz et al. (2013) is shown below.
R(KDP)
R(KDP, ZDR)
PID-based estimates
NCAR Hybrid
Z-R relationships are known to be overly simplistic, as reflectivity depends on both hydrometeor size and concentration and single polarization only captures the size in one dimension. Thus, rates that take both Z and ZDR into account have been developed, which take the form:
An example of the estimated precipitation using coefficients from Berkowitz et al. (2013) is shown below.
CSU HIDRO
Bringi
References
Berkowitz, D. S., J. A Schultz, S. Vasiloff, K.L. Elmore, C.D. Payne and J.B. Boettcher, 2013: Status of Dual Pol QPE in the WSR-88D Network. AMS 27th conference on hydrology, Austin, Texas, 2.2. Link
Bringi, V. N., Williams, C. R., Thurai, M., & May, P. T. (2009). Using Dual-Polarized Radar and Dual-Frequency Profiler for DSD Characterization: A Case Study from Darwin, Australia, Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 26(10), 2107-2122. Link
Cifelli, R., Chandrasekar, V., Lim, S., Kennedy, P. C., Wang, Y., & Rutledge, S. A. (2011). A New Dual-Polarization Radar Rainfall Algorithm: Application in Colorado Precipitation Events, Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 28(3), 352-364. Link